DV Hardware bringing you the hottest news about processors, graphics cards, Intel, AMD, NVIDIA, ATi, hardware and technology!

   Home | News submit | News Archives | Reviews | Articles | Howto's | Downloads | Mirror Area | Advertise
 
DarkVision Hardware - Daily tech news
  Login/sign up  


Main Menu

Home
User account
Info
News archives
Links
Articles
Howto
Reviews
Member list
 

Who's Online
There are currently 231 people and 0 DV-member(s) online.

 

Latest Reviews
  • Super Talent Pico 8GB USB Drive
  • Razer Destructor mousepad
  • Ghost Squad for Nintendo Wii
  • OCZ DDR2 PC2-9200 Reaper HPC Edition
  • Vizo Ninja II notebook cooler
  • PC Power & Cooling Silencer 610 PSU
  • Mario & Sonic at the Olympic Games for Nintendo Wii
  • OhMiBod Boditalk Escort
  •  

    RSS
    RSS
    RSS by email. Enter your email address:

     

    ''Prescott 64bit instructions incompatible with AMD's''

    Posted on Monday, February 09 2004 @ 21:48:46 CET by Thomas De Maesschalck


    According to The Inquirer their sources, Mark LaPedus and Nathan Brookwood, Intel his Prescott has 64bit capabilities built-in but they are not compatible with AMD's x86-64 instructions.
    He claims the Prescott's 64-bit extensions are different, and Intel won't implement it in this chip, but rather wait until the Tejas *T recension, which is supposed to arrive next year.

    Current roadmaps Intel is showing its partners demonstrate that Prescotts will clock to 4GHz by the end of the year, with the firm talking vaguely about a "next generation" chip. Intel's problem is that it find itself in the horns of a dilemma. If it does pre-announce a 64-bit extension desktop processor, it may have a difficult job explaining just how such a chip fits in with its current Itanium 64-bit processor.

    But Intel has had difficulty explaining things before when it changes its mind – with the Rambus affair being the biggest volte face in recent times.
    Source: The Inquirer


    Add to Del.icio.us | Digg It

     
    Threshold
      
    The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.
     

    DarkVision Hardware - Privacy statement
    All logos and trademarks are property of their respective owner.
    The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2002-2008 DarkVision Hardware