DV Hardware bringing you the hottest news about processors, graphics cards, Intel, AMD, NVIDIA, ATi, hardware and technology!

   Home | News submit | News Archives | Reviews | Articles | Howto's | Advertise
 
DarkVision Hardware - Daily tech news
  Login/sign up  


Main Menu

Home
User account
Info
News archives
Links
Articles
Howto
Reviews
Member list
 

Who's Online
There are currently 216 people and 0 DV-member(s) online.

 

Latest Reviews
  • Enermax Aeolus Premium CP003
  • Altego Clear Laptop Sleeve
  • Lian Li PC-V354
  • Arctic Cooling K381 keyboard
  • Arctic Power Charger Plus
  • ATP PhotoFinder Mini
  • BitFenix Colossus
  • Roccat Taito Kingsize mTw Edition mousepad
  •  

    RSS
    RSS
     

    Palit extremely unhappy with AMD's GPU policy

    Posted on Wednesday, May 27 2009 @ 18:25:02 CEST by Thomas De Maesschalck


    Bright Side of News claims it's not only Gainward that is considering to dump ATI, parent company Palit is reportedly extremely unsatisfied with the way how AMD treats them. The rumor is that AMD is trying to protect vendors such as Sapphire and PowerColor, and doesn't allow others that don't belong to the select few to build custom Radeon graphics cards.
    The reason why AMD allegedly did not sell 4770/4890 chips to Gainward was the Radeon 4850 card with GDDR5 memory. Partners did not like what Gainward did, ATI requested that Gainward stops advertising and selling the 4850 GDDR5 card. Gainward refused to do so. This was followed by the lack of 4850 chips for Palit, and the "punishment" was the lack of any 4770/4890 allocation.

    In the future, Gainward and the whole Palit group plan to position their retail strategy on custom-build PCBs, with a straight policy of releasing a top-notch, no-cost-saving PCB for the high end model and optimizing for "higher-end" and "affordable price points".



     
    Threshold
      
    The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.
     

    DV Hardware - Privacy statement
    All logos and trademarks are property of their respective owner.
    The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2002-2012 DM Media Group bvba