 |
|
Who's Online
|
There are currently 356 people and 1 DV-member(s) online.
|
|
|
|
|
RSS
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Re: Intel's Performance Per Watt to be bad for AMD? (Score: 0)
by Anonymous on Saturday, September 03 2005 @ 15:41:52 CEST
Amd overall has the Better product, in desktop, server, and even in he notebook sector. Intel always promotes their CPU's and say how great they will be, only to come out with something that is sub-par. Also the misleading PAPER launches of intel tries to make it seem they are as current as AMD. As for the marketshare, Intel has billions on advertising and power to muscle AMD out of markets and has been proven. Reason japan banned them for a month, also there are investigations done in europe as well against Intel. Amd probably wont win the lawsuit, but will bring certain things to light. Both CPU's are great, but for now AMD is better and has been on the right track. Most AMD's releases have had little problems, in where intel keeps running into problems. That will keep going as proof with dual cores, until the restructured Intel starts working again. Also those who think the Pentium M is a better CPU (Centrino is not the name of the PM, but the combination of the PM, the intel chipset and intels wireless in a laptop) are wrong. The reason why the PM was winning over Turion initially is because it was tested in a desktop setting. New tests and benchmarks done in a Notebook setting shows that the Turion is a better performer. Also the Turions are more cost effective
here is one site for proof
http://www.laptoplogic.com/resources/articles/42/1/1/
In the last few years, AMD has released more technology advances as Intel. Maybe once Intel gets back on its feet, we may see a good competition. But if the past can tell the future, when AMd said they would have a good product, they were good on their word, and Intel.....well, they talk a lot and dont really havent lived upto the expectations.
|
|
| 
|
