 |
|
Who's Online
|
There are currently 410 people and 0 DV-member(s) online.
|
|
|
|
|
RSS
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Disagree (Score: 0)
by Anonymous on Friday, September 29 2006 @ 22:02:16 CEST
Your cd/m2 comment, although may make sense in theory, is incorrect when applied to real world applications.
What you forgot to mention is that when using a 300cd/m2 LCD, the white's on one's screen are NOT white. They are of yellowish hew, which, I find, are tiring on the eyes.
Now, the moment you go to a higher cd/m2 LCD, such as a 400, you will notice your white's be WHITE, I mean clear and crisp, very vibrant due to the high brightness. Sure, its bright, but once your eyes adjust (about 2 days), you will NOT want to go back to a lower rated cd/m2 LCD... GUARANTEED!
And the real test is when you go back to your 300cd/m2 rated screen, and you will realize how 'yellow' it looks and how tired your eyes become looking at it.
When it comes to games, ANY LCD will do, as long as its got the low 'ms' rating, that is all it matters.
|
|
| 
|
