DV Hardware - review of Debugging the Megahertz Myth Editorial
   Home | News submit | News Archives | Reviews | Articles | Howto's | Advertise
 
DarkVision Hardware - Daily tech news
  Login/sign up  

Main Menu

Home
User account
Info
News archives
Links
Articles
Howto
Reviews
Member list
 

Who's Online
There are currently 223 people and 0 DV-member(s) online.

 

Latest Reviews
  • Enermax Aeolus Premium CP003
  • Altego Clear Laptop Sleeve
  • Lian Li PC-V354
  • Arctic Cooling K381 keyboard
  • Arctic Power Charger Plus
  • ATP PhotoFinder Mini
  • BitFenix Colossus
  • Roccat Taito Kingsize mTw Edition mousepad
  •  

    RSS
    RSS
     

    Debugging the Megahertz Myth Editorial Review

    Posted on Thursday, September 16 2004 @ 19:46:57 CEST by LSDsmurf


    Most, if not all, of you have read or been in heated debates over why or why not higher clocked microprocessors are better than their "comparable" competition. Just why is it that so many people stand behind their arguments about a 2.4GHz processor outperforming a 3.4GHz processor overall? Also, why do benchmarks sometimes show lower clocked processors beating higher clocked processors in some tests? I thought gigahertz and megahertz determined a processor’s performance… Well, you’d be surprised if you are one who thought that.

    Link: CTZ

    Post your thoughts on this product | | 0 comments


     

    DV Hardware - Privacy statement
    All logos and trademarks are property of their respective owner.
    The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2002-2012 DM Media Group bvba