DV Hardware bringing you the hottest news about processors, graphics cards, Intel, AMD, NVIDIA, hardware and technology!

   Home | News submit | News Archives | Reviews | Articles | Howto's | Advertise
 
DarkVision Hardware - Daily tech news
December 6, 2016 
Main Menu
Home
Info
News archives
Articles
Howto
Reviews
 

Who's Online
There are currently 61 people online.

 

Latest Reviews
Zowie P-TF Rough mousepad
Zowie FK mouse
BitFenix Ronin case
Ozone Rage ST headset
Lamptron FC-10 SE fan controller
ZOWIE G-TF Rough mousepad
ROCCAT Isku FX gaming keyboard
Prolimatech Magnetic Pin
 

Follow us
RSS
 

Why Intel processors don't have an integrated memory controller

Posted on Thursday, March 09 2006 @ 01:53:12 CET by


Intel's CEO Paul Otellini today said the reason why Intel doesn't include a memory controller on its chips like AMD does is the costs.

A memory controller onboard of the processor increases system performance because it cuts down the commute time for electrons.
Intel does not integrate the memory controller. One reason is that memory standards change. Current Athlon computers, for instance, don't come with DDR II memory because the integrated memory controller connects to DDR I. Intel once tried to come out with a chip, Timna, that had an integrated memory controller that hooked up to Rambus. The flop of Rambus in the market led to the untimely demise of the chip.

Another reason is that Intel puts a lot of cache on its chips, which cuts down the need for an integrated memory controller, he said in an interview at the Intel Developer Forum.

"The only thing better than having an integrated memory controller on having the memory on chip," he said.
More details over at


 



 

DV Hardware - Privacy statement
All logos and trademarks are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2002-2016 DM Media Group bvba