Recently I tested a number of DDR2 memory configurations ranging from 667MHz through to 1181MHz and determined that the Intel Core 2 Duo processors are not really affected by memory frequency. Rather, it appeared that memory timings were more important. So today I have an article for you comparing various memory timings at 800MHz. Once again the results are very interesting and certainly not what I was expecting...
The point of the DDR2 Memory Frequency Performance article was to prove that when overclocking, the 1:1 ratio is not important and we proved this with the 1066MHz configuration. Moving on, there were a few good suggestions made by readers about the first article that they would have liked to have seen. That being a broader range of memory timings, not just memory frequencies, so it could be determined whether low-latency DDR2-800 memory for example, was really required. While this kind of testing could have been done with DDR2-533 or even DDR2-667 memory, we chose DDR2-800 memory as it is the more popular choice. Furthermore, the price difference between these three standards is often very minimal.
Check it out over at Legion Hardware.
DDR2 Memory Latency Performance
Posted on Thursday, March 22 2007 @ 4:16 CET by Thomas De Maesschalck