DV Hardware bringing you the hottest news about processors, graphics cards, Intel, AMD, NVIDIA, hardware and technology!

   Home | News submit | News Archives | Reviews | Articles | Howto's | Advertise
 
DarkVision Hardware - Daily tech news
December 6, 2016 
Main Menu
Home
Info
News archives
Articles
Howto
Reviews
 

Who's Online
There are currently 115 people online.

 

Latest Reviews
Zowie P-TF Rough mousepad
Zowie FK mouse
BitFenix Ronin case
Ozone Rage ST headset
Lamptron FC-10 SE fan controller
ZOWIE G-TF Rough mousepad
ROCCAT Isku FX gaming keyboard
Prolimatech Magnetic Pin
 

Follow us
RSS
 

Half Life 2 Performance

Posted on Thursday, September 11 2003 @ 12:43:30 CEST by


AnandTech has posted a small article on the performance on ATI and NVIDIA cards in Half Life 2:

- Valve is pissed at all of the benchmarking "optimizations" they've seen in the hardware community;
- Half-Life 2 has a special NV3x codepath that was necessary to make NVIDIA's architecture perform reasonably under the game;
- Valve recommends running geforce fx 5200 and 5600 cards in dx8 mode in order to get playable frame rates.
- even with the special NV3x codepath, ATI is the clear performance leader under Half-Life 2 with the Radeon 9800 Pro hitting around 60 fps at 10x7. The 5900 ultra is noticeably slower with the special codepath and is horrendously slower under the default dx9 codepath;
- the Radeon 9600 Pro performs very well - it is a good competitor of the 5900 ultra;
- ATI didn't need these special optimizations to perform well and Valve insists that they have not optimized the game specifically for any vendor.


There you have it folks, there's much more coming tomorrow.


AnandTech did not mention anything about the Detonator 50 drivers which are promised to give big improvement in DirectX9.

ExtremeTech has also made an article about Half Life 2, with benchmarks provided by Valve. They do mention the Det50 drivers :
nVidia has been circulating its Det50 driver to analysts in hopes that we would use it for our Half-Life 2 benchmarking. The driver contains application-specific optimizations that will likely improve nVidia's overall performance picture, however Valve's Gabe Newell expressed concerns that some of nVidia's optimizations may go too far. Doug Lombardi of Valve has explicitly asked that beta versions of the Det50 drivers not be used for benchmarking.
A very confusing situation, do the Det50 drivers (which are totally reprogrammed from zero) still contain optimizations? Or is this just exaggerated by ATI and Valve because they have a good relation with each other? Within a few days/weeks we will hopefully know it.. Here is one of the benchmarks from ExtremeTech :
More can be found here


Source : AnandTech and ExtremeTech



 






Use Disqus to post new comments, the old comments are listed below.


Re: Half Life 2 Performance
by CAG on Thursday, September 11 2003 @ 13:05:27 CEST
Can you imagine having just spent ~$500 on a GeForce FX 5900 Ultra and then reading that it can't out-perform a $200 ATi card? BTW, I have an ATi 9800.



  • Reply by Anonymous on Thursday, September 11 2003 @ 16:33:43 CEST

    YAY!!!!!!!
    Me Too, go ATI


Re: Half Life 2 Performance
by Anonymous on Wednesday, January 05 2005 @ 04:27:21 CET
I dont think not being able to use the right drivvers that invidia has maid to run this game better on there cards is the right way to go considering they spent the whole time making the game to get it to work spacificly with ati cards:P and iv seen benchmarks with the approprite drivers and the fx 5900 is almost toe to toe with the 9800



 

DV Hardware - Privacy statement
All logos and trademarks are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2002-2016 DM Media Group bvba