DV Hardware - bringing you the hottest news about processors, graphics cards, Intel, AMD, NVIDIA, hardware and technology!
   Home | News submit | News Archives | Reviews | Articles | Howto's | Advertise
DarkVision Hardware - Daily tech news
February 29, 2020 
Main Menu
News archives

Who's Online
There are currently 74 people online.


Latest Reviews
Ewin Racing Flash gaming chair
Arctic BioniX F120 and F140 fans
Jaybird Freedom 2 wireless sport headphones
Ewin Racing Champion gaming chair
Zowie P-TF Rough mousepad
Zowie FK mouse
BitFenix Ronin case
Ozone Rage ST headset

Follow us

Radeon HD 4850 CrossFire vs GeForce GTX 280 in 3DMark Vantage

Posted on Saturday, June 14 2008 @ 00:55:50 CEST by

Chiphell published 3DMark Vantage results of a Radeon HD 4850 CrossFire setup and another site tested the GeForce GTX 280. The Radeon cards were benched on an overclocked Intel QX9650 @ 4GHz while the GeForce card used a QX9770 @ 3.2GHz:

ATI Radeon HD 4850 CrossFire in 3DMark Vantage GPU: 625MHz, memory: 2200MHz):
  • X5089
  • H7611
  • P11918
  • NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280 in 3DMark Vantage (GPU: 602MHz, memory: 2214MHz, shader: 1296MHz):
  • X4889
  • P10802
  • NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280 overclocked in 3DMark Vantage (GPU: 675MHz, memory: 2400MHz, shader: 1456MHz):
  • X5384
  • P11854
  • The CrossFire setup uses a faster CPU but it seems like two Radeon HD 4850 will offer about the same performance as a GeForce GTX 280, at least in 3DMark Vantage. One GeForce GTX 280 will cost you around $649 while two Radeon HD 4850 cards will cost around $400-$460.


    Use Disqus to post new comments, the old comments are listed below.

    Re: Radeon HD 4850 CrossFire vs GeForce GTX 280 in 3DMark Vantage
    by Anonymous on Saturday, June 14 2008 @ 01:23:11 CEST
    Yeah but CrossFire (and SLI) suck. A single fast card is the way to go.

    Re: Radeon HD 4850 CrossFire vs GeForce GTX 280 in 3DMark Vantage
    by Anonymous on Saturday, June 14 2008 @ 20:16:34 CEST

    Crossfire and SLI = lots of compatibility problems, micro stuttering, higher power consumption, ...

    • Reply by Anonymous on Sunday, June 15 2008 @ 03:09:59 CEST

      3dmark scores are not reliable benchmarks. Crysis and other game benches are the only way to tell.

    • Reply by Anonymous on Tuesday, June 24 2008 @ 05:59:56 CEST

      i couldn't agree more, crossfire and sli are such a huge waste of money, spend your money on the newest single card, and you'll be happier with the money you spent, 3dmark score don't tell you how the game's smoothness will feel with multi gpu set-ups (contrary to popular belief.) I also just bought the superclock gtx 280 from evga, major heating problem, but the graphics all the way up with shader 3 on age of conan, feel so smooth, and the textures in caves and whatnot, are so much more life-like, it's amazing. plan on getting the same card from a different manufacturer, I may also wait to see what the new radeon cards with DDR5 can do, especially the ones with the 1ghz plus gpu's; exciting (though I am an nVidia dude)


    DV Hardware - Privacy statement
    All logos and trademarks are property of their respective owner.
    The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2002-2019 DM Media Group bvba