The witness in question was none other than an unidentified senior Dell executive, who is thought to have told the investigation in August 2006 that he viewed the performance of AMD, the alleged injured party in the Intel investigation, as "very poor". The inference of this is that Dell's decision to favour Intel over AMD was based on the relative quality of their products, rather than financial incentives.
European Ombudsman criticizes Intel's fine
Posted on Monday, August 10 2009 @ 16:47 CEST by Thomas De Maesschalck