AMD Bulldozer debut underwhelms reviewers

Posted on Wednesday, October 12 2011 @ 16:33 CEST by Thomas De Maesschalck
TechPowerUp checked out about 25 reviews of AMD's new FX-series "Bulldozer" processors and comes to the conclusion that the chip doesn't deliver what it promised. The performance doesn't live up to expectations, there are no significant clock-for-clock improvements and the load power draw isn't up to today's standards. The pricing could be a saving grace though, and one area where the chip definitely delivers is overclocking potential. You can read the full summary over here.
After drawing a consensus from about 25 reviews (links in Today's Reviews on the front page), it emerges that:

  • AMD FX-8150 is missing its performance expectations by a fair margin. Not to mention performance gains in its own presentation, these expectations were built up by how AMD was shaping the product to be a full-fledged enthusiast product with significant performance gains over the previous generation
  • AMD ill-marketed the FX-8150. Hype is a double-edged sword, and should not be used if you're not confident your offering will live up to at least most of the hype. AMD marketed at least the top-tier FX-8000 series eight-core processors as the second coming of Athlon64 FX.


  • About the Author

    Thomas De Maesschalck

    Thomas has been messing with computer since early childhood and firmly believes the Internet is the best thing since sliced bread. Enjoys playing with new tech, is fascinated by science, and passionate about financial markets. When not behind a computer, he can be found with running shoes on or lifting heavy weights in the weight room.



    Loading Comments