DV Hardware bringing you the hottest news about processors, graphics cards, Intel, AMD, NVIDIA, ATi, hardware and technology!

   Home | News submit | News Archives | Reviews | Articles | Howto's | Downloads | Mirror Area | Advertise
 
DarkVision Hardware - Daily tech news
  Login/sign up  


Main Menu

Home
User account
Info
News archives
Links
Articles
Howto
Reviews
Member list
 

Who's Online
There are currently 508 people and 1 DV-member(s) online.

 

Latest Reviews
  • ATP EarthDrive 4GB USB Drive
  • Kingston DataTraveler 150 32GB USB drive
  • Super Talent Pico 8GB USB Drive
  • Razer Destructor mousepad
  • Ghost Squad for Nintendo Wii
  • OCZ DDR2 PC2-9200 Reaper HPC Edition
  • Vizo Ninja II notebook cooler
  • PC Power & Cooling Silencer 610 PSU
  •  

    RSS
    RSS
    RSS by email. Enter your email address:

     

    Recommended: Click here to Update all your outdated drivers

    ATI sued for inflating its stock price

    Posted on Tuesday, August 30 2005 @ 17:13:13 CEST by Thomas De Maesschalck


    ATI was sued two weeks ago because of false and misleading statements. The complaint charges ATI and certain of its officers and directors with violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. As a result of this ATI's stock traded at inflated levels, allowing ATI's top officers and directors to sell or otherwise dispose of more than $54 million worth of their own shares at artificially inflated prices.

    Here's a look at some facts from the complaint which were known by ATI but concealed from the investing public during the class period which started on October 7, 2004 and ended on June 23, 2005:
    a) the Company was selling desktop and notebook products with lower and lower profit margins;
    (b) ATI's gross margins were being weakened by high sales of its IGP products, which have profit margins well below the corporate average;
    (c) the Company was earning lower-than-anticipated yields on certain products due to operational issues in its own packaging and test areas of its manufacturing process;
    (d) the Company was experiencing production/design/yield issues with its R520 chip;
    (e) the Company was losing market share to arch-rivals Nvidia Corp. and Intel Corp.; and
    (f) despite defendants' previous statements to the contrary, a fire at one of the Company's primary suppliers in Taiwan was preventing the Company from receiving necessary supplies.
    The complaint further alleges that on or around June 6, 2005, ATI warned that its revenue for the third quarter 2005 would fall well below its previously announced forecast. Thereafter, when the Company issued its actual third quarter 2005 financial results on June 23, 2005, reporting a quarterly loss of $445,000 in the third quarter 2005 compared to a profit of $48.6 million in the third quarter 2004 and further reducing fourth quarter 2005 revenue expectations by $20-$50 million, the Company's stock price fell another 8% to its lowest point since July 2003 on extremely high volume.

    Source: Stanford


    Add to Del.icio.us | Digg It

     
    Threshold
      
    The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.
     

    DarkVision Hardware - Privacy statement
    All logos and trademarks are property of their respective owner.
    The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2002-2008 DarkVision Hardware