So how much does the 212 EVO differ from it's immediate predecessor? Well on the face of it, not a lot. They look practically identical, they are essentially the same size. and allowing for inflation are slotted into the same price point in the market. The fan mounted on the EVO does appear to be slightly different in appearance than the plus, being of the smoked black rather than than flat black variety, looking at the figures it appears to have much the same noise and CFM ratings as the older model. So surely this isn't the same cooler with a slightly different fan? Well as the saying goes, the devil is in the detail and the detail in question here is in the layout of the CPU contact plate. Both the 212 plus and the EVO utilise the direct contact method for their heat-pipes, as opposed to having them embedded within the body of the contact plate. the difference is that with the EVO the gaps between the heat-pipes are reduced thus creating a greater surface area for heat transfer and as such better cooling performance (that's the theory anyway). click on the image below for Coolermasters own take on the differences between direct contact and Continuous direct contact.



Link: Overclock3d