In the past, Intel already had a foundry division but the company failed to attract enough clients. Various restrictions as well as the failed rollout of the 10nm node resulted in the end of the foundry unit -- but now Gelsinger is reviving the idea with the hopes of making Intel a leading semiconductor foundry.
How Intel will license x86
One of the interesting things is that Intel's x86 architecture will become less of a walled garden. AnandTech has decent coverage about this over here. Not only will Intel use external foundries like TSMC to manufacture x86 cores -- the chip giant will also make it possible for clients to use x86 core IP via the new Intel Foundry Services.The exact details are still a bit muddy -- but Gelsinger promises Intel Foundry Services will be a lot more open than the "walled garden" foundry services that were offered almost seven years ago, under the leadership of then CEO Brian Krzanich. Gelsinger called the previous foundry effort "weak" -- but time will learn us whether this time will really be different. Things could get really exciting if Intel adopted an ARM-like model.
Intel will enable a fully vertical model with its IP portfolio, allowing customers to choose from x86 cores, graphics, media, display, AI, interconnect, fabric, packaging, and other critical foundational IP from other sources (such as Arm, RISC-V). The exact way in which customers will be able to license the IP will be announced in due course, but if Intel were to follow the Arm model, then Intel customers will get access to Intel’s 86 core designs.
Intel foundry push primarily bad news for Samsung
While TSMC took a hit on the stock market after Gelsinger's announcement, analysts believe there's more at stake for Samsung. Citing a paywalled article from DigiTimes, Seeking Alpha reports TSMC has already signed new supply deals with Intel. It's believed TSMC will remain the Intel's biggest foundry partner. TSMC is the dominant force in the bleeding-edge semiconductor foundry market, with Samsung taking a distant second place.The report predicts there's more at stake for Samsung, as Samsung was already pushing its own capital expenditure in an effort to become more competitive with TSMC. Intel plans $19-20 billion in capex this year, while TSMC plans $25-28 billion in capex.