AMD Ryzen 9 3900X in short supply for at least a couple more weeks

Thomas De Maesschalck Posted on by
AMD logo
Dutch webshop Azerty shed some light about the European availability of AMD's Ryzen 9 3900X CPU. The shop is one of the biggest in the Netherlands and they confirm availability will remain poor for the foreseeable future.

The company representative says they've received over 100 unique orders with at least one Ryzen 9 3900X processor. This week they expect to receive some inventory but this will be about 10 units at most. Azerty is an AMD Official Launch Partner, which means they receive priority supply versus stores that do not have this certification.

In a follow up message, the Azerty guy reveals they got in touch with AMD Europe. They received the following message from a contact at AMD Europe:
“Regarding Ryzen 9 3900X, it will likely be 2-3 weeks before we start to see available stock within distributors.”
So basically, it will be hard to get your hands on a Ryzen 9 3900X this summer.

Via: Hardware.info
Thomas De Maesschalck

About the Author

Thomas De Maesschalck

Thomas has been messing with computer since early childhood and firmly believes the Internet is the best thing since sliced bread. Enjoys playing with new tech, is fascinated by science, and passionate about financial markets. When not behind a computer, he can be found with running shoes on or lifting heavy weights in the weight room.
Thanks. Your comment is waiting for moderation.
Your comment was published.

Comments (1)

  1. paulprochnow

    I dunno people can hear much on this CPU No extensive test by the USAUL SUSPECTS to date. I know mine will not do 100% benchmark runs without nearly throttling. So this CPU is as most and has thermal protection. I woul dnot run mine with the Wratith provided. I now can run 100% and be far far from the throttle point in Ryzrn Master. I would brag on it, but review readers are choosy picky sorts that will ask "whadda-bouta" all the time...it is irritating. I just want a kick azz CPU for me.

    Reply

Reply to paulprochnow

Replying to paulprochnow