DV Hardware bringing you the hottest news about processors, graphics cards, Intel, AMD, NVIDIA, hardware and technology!

   Home | News submit | News Archives | Reviews | Articles | Howto's | Advertise
 
DarkVision Hardware - Daily tech news
December 6, 2016 
Main Menu
Home
Info
News archives
Articles
Howto
Reviews
 

Who's Online
There are currently 116 people online.

 

Latest Reviews
Zowie P-TF Rough mousepad
Zowie FK mouse
BitFenix Ronin case
Ozone Rage ST headset
Lamptron FC-10 SE fan controller
ZOWIE G-TF Rough mousepad
ROCCAT Isku FX gaming keyboard
Prolimatech Magnetic Pin
 

Follow us
RSS
 

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280 folds 3x faster than Radeon HD 3870

Posted on Friday, May 23 2008 @ 15:06:13 CEST by


NVIDIA announced at a press meeting that a Folding @ Home client for NVIDIA GPUs will soon be available. Nordic Hardware published a photo of a slide that indicates the upcoming GeForce GTX 280 GPU will be three times faster in this application than ATI's Radeon HD 3870! The GeForce GTX 280 will do slightly more than 500 mol/day, which is three times more than the 170 mol/day of the Radeon HD 3870 and five times more than the 100 mol/day of the PlayStation 3.
Alas there have been little information on the real-life performance of the card, other than statements that it runs Crysis fine at certain settings and that it scores 7000 points in the Vantage Extreme profile. We've been provided some more solid information based on the performance in Stanford's Folding@Home client. A slide recently presented says that GeForce GTX 280 will be capable of folding slightly more than 500 mol/day, which is three times more than what Radeon HD 3870 can do, about 170 mol/day (according to the slide), or five times more than PlayStation 3; 100 mol/day.



 






Use Disqus to post new comments, the old comments are listed below.


Wow & mathematical correction
by Anonymous on Tuesday, June 03 2008 @ 00:27:33 CEST
Awesome. Looking forward to Folding on nVidia.

BTW 500 is about 3 times AS FAST as 170, NOT 3 times faster. 3 times faster than 170 would make it 680. "times faster" and "times as fast" are NOT the same, despite popular (ab)use.

Challenge: calculate both ways your new pay after a 100% increase, which do you prefer, the same money or double? :-)




 

DV Hardware - Privacy statement
All logos and trademarks are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2002-2016 DM Media Group bvba