DV Hardware bringing you the hottest news about processors, graphics cards, Intel, AMD, NVIDIA, ATi, hardware and technology!

   Home | News submit | News Archives | Reviews | Articles | Howto's | Downloads | Mirror Area | Advertise
 
DarkVision Hardware - Daily tech news
  Login/sign up  


Main Menu

Home
User account
Info
News archives
Links
Articles
Howto
Reviews
Member list
 

Who's Online
There are currently 320 people and 0 DV-member(s) online.

 

Latest Reviews
  • Super Talent Pico 8GB USB Drive
  • Razer Destructor mousepad
  • Ghost Squad for Nintendo Wii
  • OCZ DDR2 PC2-9200 Reaper HPC Edition
  • Vizo Ninja II notebook cooler
  • PC Power & Cooling Silencer 610 PSU
  • Mario & Sonic at the Olympic Games for Nintendo Wii
  • OhMiBod Boditalk Escort
  •  

    RSS
    RSS
    RSS by email. Enter your email address:

     

    Intel proposes power efficiency focused processor benchmark

    Posted on Friday, September 29 2006 @ 02:12:05 CEST by Thomas De Maesschalck


    Pat Gelsiner from Intel mentioned at the IDF that Intel is working on a benchmark that will focus on power efficiency of a processor.
    If you are closely following benchmark values in processor tests than you may soon find a new, somewhat standardized official discipline, which has been covered by Tom's Hardware for quite a while. According to Gelsinger, Intel is working with Bapco on "Ecomark," a Sysmark-based benchmark that will take into account sleep times of a processor and even indicate how the user has to spend to run a computer system (without monitor) based on a very specific processor. Preliminary numbers provided by Intel indicate that an entry-level desktop Core 2 Duo system may cost just under $14 per year, while the mobile T7600 version is estimated to cost less than $10.
    More info over here.


    Add to Del.icio.us | Digg It

     
    Threshold
      
    The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.
     

    DarkVision Hardware - Privacy statement
    All logos and trademarks are property of their respective owner.
    The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2002-2008 DarkVision Hardware