DV Hardware bringing you the hottest news about processors, graphics cards, Intel, AMD, NVIDIA, ATi, hardware and technology!

   Home | News submit | News Archives | Reviews | Articles | Howto's | Advertise
 
DarkVision Hardware - Daily tech news
  Login/sign up  


Main Menu

Home
User account
Info
News archives
Links
Articles
Howto
Reviews
Member list
 

Who's Online
There are currently 127 people and 0 DV-member(s) online.

 

Latest Reviews
  • Enermax Aeolus Premium CP003
  • Altego Clear Laptop Sleeve
  • Lian Li PC-V354
  • Arctic Cooling K381 keyboard
  • Arctic Power Charger Plus
  • ATP PhotoFinder Mini
  • BitFenix Colossus
  • Roccat Taito Kingsize mTw Edition mousepad
  •  

    RSS
    RSS
     

    AMD Quad FX slower and more power hungry than Intel Kentsfield

    Posted on Thursday, November 30 2006 @ 15:40:15 CET by Thomas De Maesschalck


    AMD released its Quad FX processors today, The Inq analyzed one of the early reviews and found out this processor gets crushed by Intel's Kentsfield processors:
    Test scores reveal that Quad FX manages to achieve equal performance to Core 2 Extreme QX6700 in SiSoft Sandra 2007 and PCMark05 and narrowly edged it in memory tests: both L1, L2 and system memory latency are better on QuadFX than on Kentsfield, but that's nothing new.

    However, taking a look into media encoding shows that QuadFather just gets crushed by Kentsfield, especially in MPEG-2 8Mbit reproduction. But the worst result for AMD is a look into power consumption and performance per watt. AMD system consumes far more power than Intel, sometimes even double that Kentsfield setup.



     
    Threshold
      
    The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.
     

    DV Hardware - Privacy statement
    All logos and trademarks are property of their respective owner.
    The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2002-2012 DM Media Group bvba