DV Hardware bringing you the hottest news about processors, graphics cards, Intel, AMD, NVIDIA, ATi, hardware and technology!

   Home | News submit | News Archives | Reviews | Articles | Howto's | Advertise
 
DarkVision Hardware - Daily tech news
  Login/sign up  


Main Menu

Home
User account
Info
News archives
Links
Articles
Howto
Reviews
Member list
 

Who's Online
There are currently 453 people and 2 DV-member(s) online.

 

Latest Reviews
  • Laptop Lifts
  • Logitech Illuminated Keyboard
  • ZOWIE P-RF mousepad
  • Cooler Master Storm Sniper case
  • Razer Lachesis mouse
  • Sharkoon PC Jump Start
  • Lowepro Cirrus TLZ 25 camera bag
  • Patriot Xporter Magnum 64GB
  •  

    RSS
    RSS
    RSS by email. Enter your email address:

     

    Ubuntu: 32-bit v. 64-bit Performance

    Posted on Sunday, December 31 2006 @ 10:13:02 CET by Thomas De Maesschalck


    While 64-bit support is now considered common for both Intel and AMD processors, many Linux (as well as Windows) users are uncertain whether to use a 32-bit or 64-bit operating system with there being advantages for both paths. With this being the last Phoronix article for 2006, we decided to take this opportunity to look at the common question of whether to use 32-bit or 64-bit software. In this article, we will be comparing the i386 and x86_64 performance with Ubuntu 6.10 Edgy Eft and Ubuntu 7.04 Feisty Fawn Herd 1 to see how the numbers truly stack up.

    Check it out at Phoronix.


    Add to Del.icio.us | Digg It

     
    Threshold
      
    The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.
     

    DV Hardware - Privacy statement
    All logos and trademarks are property of their respective owner.
    The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2002-2010 DM Media Group bvba