DV Hardware bringing you the hottest news about processors, graphics cards, Intel, AMD, NVIDIA, ATi, hardware and technology!

   Home | News submit | News Archives | Reviews | Articles | Howto's | Downloads | Mirror Area | Advertise
 
DarkVision Hardware - Daily tech news
  Login/sign up  


Main Menu

Home
User account
Info
News archives
Links
Articles
Howto
Reviews
Member list
 

Who's Online
There are currently 454 people and 0 DV-member(s) online.

 

Latest Reviews
  • Kingston DataTraveler 150 32GB USB drive
  • Super Talent Pico 8GB USB Drive
  • Razer Destructor mousepad
  • Ghost Squad for Nintendo Wii
  • OCZ DDR2 PC2-9200 Reaper HPC Edition
  • Vizo Ninja II notebook cooler
  • PC Power & Cooling Silencer 610 PSU
  • Mario & Sonic at the Olympic Games for Nintendo Wii
  •  

    RSS
    RSS
    RSS by email. Enter your email address:

     

    Recommended: Click here to Update all your outdated drivers

    Intel's new processor naming system

    Posted on Tuesday, March 30 2004 @ 00:47:08 CEST by Thomas De Maesschalck


    Digit-Life has some concrete information regarding Intel's forthcoming changes in the naming system of their processors. This information comes from the Russian departement of Intel.
    The key change is the lack of clock speeds in names of Intel's future CPUs. Actually, it will be replaced with a so called processor number.

    The official version is that the extension of lines, especially in the desktop sector, and availability of processors based on different architectures and even cores make the situation pretty confusing. One of the examples is 4 modifications of the Pentium 4 CPU clocked at 2.8 GHz:

    Pentium 4 2.8 GHz (Northwood, 512 KB L2, 533 MHz FSB)
    Pentium 4 2.8A GHz (Prescott, 1 MB L2, 533 MHz FSB)
    Pentium 4 2.8C (Northwood, 512 KB L2, 800 MHz FSB, Hyper-Threading)
    Pentium 4 2.8E (Prescott, 1 MB L2, 800 MHz FSB, Hyper-Threading)

    The difference in their parameters is great, therefore, they might have different performance, price and an area of application. Sometimes it's also used by hardware sellers to play tricks with buyers. That is why from Intel's point of view the current situation makes it necessary to redefine the conception of naming its processors in order to prevent possible mistakes and makes processor names simple and logical from an end-user's standpoint.
    Lots more information over at Digit-life


    Add to Del.icio.us | Digg It

     
    Threshold
      
    The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.
     

    DarkVision Hardware - Privacy statement
    All logos and trademarks are property of their respective owner.
    The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2002-2008 DarkVision Hardware