DV Hardware bringing you the hottest news about processors, graphics cards, Intel, AMD, NVIDIA, ATi, hardware and technology!

   Home | News submit | News Archives | Reviews | Articles | Howto's | Downloads | Mirror Area | Advertise
 
DarkVision Hardware - Daily tech news
  Login/sign up  


Main Menu

Home
User account
Info
News archives
Links
Articles
Howto
Reviews
Member list
 

Who's Online
There are currently 301 people and 0 DV-member(s) online.

 

Latest Reviews
  • ATP EarthDrive 4GB USB Drive
  • Kingston DataTraveler 150 32GB USB drive
  • Super Talent Pico 8GB USB Drive
  • Razer Destructor mousepad
  • Ghost Squad for Nintendo Wii
  • OCZ DDR2 PC2-9200 Reaper HPC Edition
  • Vizo Ninja II notebook cooler
  • PC Power & Cooling Silencer 610 PSU
  •  

    RSS
    RSS
    RSS by email. Enter your email address:

     

    Recommended: Click here to Update all your outdated drivers

    Intel Prescott 4GHz planned for Q1 2005

    Posted on Monday, September 20 2004 @ 12:35:25 CEST by Thomas De Maesschalck


    Intel's 4GHz Prescott processor using LGA755 with 1MB L2 cache is targeted for Q1 2005.
    The 580 has an 800MHz system bus and will be released round about the same time as Intel's 670, 660, 650 and 640. These chips are really Gallatin core processors - they have 2MB of cache and an 800MHz front side bus, as we've reported previously.

    A quick look at the crib sheet reveals that the 670 clocks at 3.80GHz, the 660 at 3.60GHz, the 650 at 3.40GHz and the 640 at 3.20GHz. These are Extreme Edition chips - Intel is obviously pushing these as top end processors, but because megahertz don't matter any more, the clock speeds are obviously irrelevant.

    At launch time, the 670 et al won't have the no execute bit implemented.
    More info and roadmaps at The Inquirer


    Add to Del.icio.us | Digg It

     
    Threshold
      
    The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.
     

    DarkVision Hardware - Privacy statement
    All logos and trademarks are property of their respective owner.
    The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2002-2008 DarkVision Hardware