DV Hardware bringing you the hottest news about processors, graphics cards, Intel, AMD, NVIDIA, ATi, hardware and technology!

   Home | News submit | News Archives | Reviews | Articles | Howto's | Advertise
 
DarkVision Hardware - Daily tech news
  Login/sign up  


Main Menu

Home
User account
Info
News archives
Links
Articles
Howto
Reviews
Member list
 

Who's Online
There are currently 149 people and 0 DV-member(s) online.

 

Latest Reviews
  • Enermax Aeolus Premium CP003
  • Altego Clear Laptop Sleeve
  • Lian Li PC-V354
  • Arctic Cooling K381 keyboard
  • Arctic Power Charger Plus
  • ATP PhotoFinder Mini
  • BitFenix Colossus
  • Roccat Taito Kingsize mTw Edition mousepad
  •  

    RSS
    RSS
     

    Intel Nehalem cache debate, and future

    Posted on Sunday, November 23 2008 @ 01:43:29 CET by Thomas De Maesschalck


    Anand Lal Shimpi from AnandTech discusses the cache of the Nehalem, the mainstream LGA1156 processors and the 32nm future processors from Intel.
    Now we’ve got an exponential growth of cache size, not linear, and all of the sudden the Core i7 conforms to societal norms. To understand why, we have to look at what happened around 2005 - 2006: Intel started shipping dual-core CPUs. As core count went up, so did the total amount of cache per chip. Dual core CPUs quickly started shipping with 2MB and 4MB of cache per chip and the outgoing 45nm quad-core Penryns had 12MB of L2 cache on a single package.

    The move to multi-core chip designs meant that the focus was no longer on feeding the individual core, but making sure all of the cores on the chip were taken care of. It’s all so very socialist (oh no! ).

    Nehalem was designed to be a quad-core product, but also one that’s able to scale up to 8 cores and down to 2 cores. Intel believes in this multi-core future so designing for dual-core didn’t make sense as eventually dual-core will go away in desktops, a future that’s still a few years away but a course we’re on nonetheless.
    Read more over here.


     
    Threshold
      
    The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.
     

    DV Hardware - Privacy statement
    All logos and trademarks are property of their respective owner.
    The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2002-2012 DM Media Group bvba