DV Hardware bringing you the hottest news about processors, graphics cards, Intel, AMD, NVIDIA, ATi, hardware and technology!

   Home | News submit | News Archives | Reviews | Articles | Howto's | Downloads | Mirror Area | Advertise
 
DarkVision Hardware - Daily tech news
  Login/sign up  


Main Menu

Home
User account
Info
News archives
Links
Articles
Howto
Reviews
Member list
 

Who's Online
There are currently 448 people and 1 DV-member(s) online.

 

Latest Reviews
  • Kingston DataTraveler 150 32GB USB drive
  • Super Talent Pico 8GB USB Drive
  • Razer Destructor mousepad
  • Ghost Squad for Nintendo Wii
  • OCZ DDR2 PC2-9200 Reaper HPC Edition
  • Vizo Ninja II notebook cooler
  • PC Power & Cooling Silencer 610 PSU
  • Mario & Sonic at the Olympic Games for Nintendo Wii
  •  

    RSS
    RSS
    RSS by email. Enter your email address:

     

    Recommended: Click here to Update all your outdated drivers

    AMD and Intel's server processors plans for 2006

    Posted on Saturday, December 31 2005 @ 19:50:27 CET by Thomas De Maesschalck



    Charlie from The Inq gives us a look at the server CPU plans of AMD and Intel for 2006:
    As we mentioned in both the earlier articles, AMD's big potential screwup is 65nm, Intel's is core delivery. For this article, we will assume they execute perfectly, meaning they do what they say. Depending on your mastery of the ancient art of fanboism, you may think one is more likely to face plant than the other, but factoring that in is an exercise for the reader.

    2006 dawns with AMD is a commanding lead in the server space in terms of power use and computational ability, they simply are in a different class than Intel's woeful offerings. Intel uses double or more power, and routinely gets stomped in benchmarks. It is so bad that AMD's server Dual Core Duel, handily won by AMD, was greeted with a yawn because it was obvious that in a fair fight, Intel didn't stand a chance.
    Read on over at The Inquirer.


    Add to Del.icio.us | Digg It

     
    Threshold
      
    The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.
     

    DarkVision Hardware - Privacy statement
    All logos and trademarks are property of their respective owner.
    The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2002-2008 DarkVision Hardware