DV Hardware - review of Mushkin PC3200 Level II V2 (2-2-2-5) DDR Memory
   Home | News submit | News Archives | Reviews | Articles | Howto's | Downloads | Mirror Area | Advertise
 
DarkVision Hardware - Daily tech news
  Login/sign up  

Main Menu

Home
User account
Info
News archives
Links
Articles
Howto
Reviews
Member list
 

Who's Online
There are currently 387 people and 2 DV-member(s) online.

 

Latest Reviews
  • Super Talent Pico 8GB USB Drive
  • Razer Destructor mousepad
  • Ghost Squad for Nintendo Wii
  • OCZ DDR2 PC2-9200 Reaper HPC Edition
  • Vizo Ninja II notebook cooler
  • PC Power & Cooling Silencer 610 PSU
  • Mario & Sonic at the Olympic Games for Nintendo Wii
  • OhMiBod Boditalk Escort
  •  

    RSS
    RSS
    RSS by email. Enter your email address:

     

    Recommended: Click here to Update all your outdated drivers

    Mushkin PC3200 Level II V2 (2-2-2-5) DDR Memory Review

    Posted on Monday, August 30 2004 @ 11:07:50 CEST by LSDsmurf


    Mushkin's Level II memory was originally manufactured using Winbond BH-5 chips which offered timings of 2-2-2 at DDR400. Unfortunately, Winbond decided to change its focus and removed itself from the market. Due to the lack of BH-5 chips, most memory manufacturers had to discontinue their 2-2-2 memory. Last June, however, Samsung answered the prayers of memory manufacturers and consumers alike when they released their new TCCD chips, bringing back those extremely low latencies we once knew and loved! Not only do the new chips offer aggressive timings, they also have plenty of headroom and should allow for overclocks in excess of DDR500!

    Corsair was the first company to introduce new modules based on Samsung's new chips. But, not to be outdone, Mushkin and OCZ announced new modules the very next day. We took a look at Corsair's PC3200 XL Pro memory earlier this month and were pleasantly surprised. Today, we will be looking at a 1 GB dual channel set of Mushkin's PC3200 Level II V2. Can Mushkin's PC3200 hold its own against Corsair? Does the use of the same chips mean we should expect the same performance? There's only one way to find out.


    Link: The Tech Lounge

    Post your thoughts on this product | | 0 comments


     

    DarkVision Hardware - Privacy statement
    All logos and trademarks are property of their respective owner.
    The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2002-2008 DarkVision Hardware