Windows XP SP2 vs Vista SP2 - round two

Posted on Tuesday, Feb 19 2008 @ 03:00 CET by Thomas De Maesschalck
ZDNet published the second round of their comparison between Windows Vista SP1 and Windows XP SP2:
Following the benchmarks I carried out last week, I decided that the PC Doc HQ lab rats needed to pull a few all-nighters and carry out some more benchmarking tests on Vista SP1 and XP SP2. Is it possible to determine conclusively which is the faster, more responsive OS?

One of the main criticisms of my initial benchmark tests was that I overlooked the fact that, under the hood, Windows Vista SP1 works differently to XP SP2 in the file copy department. The difference is down to caching and how Vista carried out uncached I/O while XP caches the files. On top of that is the further complication that the file transfer progress bars are coded to work differently. Vista’s file copy dialog box goes away when the cache is committed, while under XP the copy dialog goes away while the committal is still pending..
Check it out over here.


About the Author

Thomas De Maesschalck

Thomas has been messing with computer since early childhood and firmly believes the Internet is the best thing since sliced bread. Enjoys playing with new tech, is fascinated by science, and passionate about financial markets. When not behind a computer, he can be found with running shoes on or lifting heavy weights in the weight room.



Loading Comments



Use Disqus to post new comments, the old comments are listed below.


Re: Windows XP SP2 vs Vista SP2 - round two
by Anonymous on Sunday, Jul 25 2010 @ 10:30 CEST



Re: Windows XP SP2 vs Vista SP2 - round two
by Anonymous on Sunday, Jul 25 2010 @ 10:33 CEST