We didn't really have much time to play with this Atom N230-based setup, but as you can see the CPU doesn't really do well in multi-media applications. It doesn't even render that well, as Cinebench was incredibly slow, slower than we've seen in years.However, it's probably best to wait a bit longer for real reviews as the Atom motherboard they used in the test was a preproduction model with an alpha BIOS. The bad results could partly be caused by immature hardware/software.
On the other side, the CPU is great for surfing, typing, instant messaging and listening to music. It even plays videos just fine, whether on youtube or some .avi/.mkv files, as long as you use the VideoLAN player or ffdshow.
It doesn't consume much power, but at the same time, in multi-media applications it's slower than older Celerons, including 220 that we tested. Power consumption is only about 5W less compared to the Celeron 220 platform and it will stay under 40W. These first scores leave a bitter taste in the mouth, don't they?
Intel Atom slower than expected?
Posted on Sunday, Jun 01 2008 @ 00:11 CEST by Thomas De Maesschalck