DV Hardware - bringing you the hottest news about processors, graphics cards, Intel, AMD, NVIDIA, hardware and technology!

   Home | News submit | News Archives | Reviews | Articles | Howto's | Advertise
 
DarkVision Hardware - Daily tech news
December 12, 2017 
Main Menu
Home
Info
News archives
Articles
Howto
Reviews
 

Who's Online
There are currently 70 people online.

 

Latest Reviews
Jaybird Freedom 2 wireless sport headphones
Ewin Racing Champion gaming chair
Zowie P-TF Rough mousepad
Zowie FK mouse
BitFenix Ronin case
Ozone Rage ST headset
Lamptron FC-10 SE fan controller
ZOWIE G-TF Rough mousepad
 

Follow us
RSS
 

AMD illustrates DX12 performance gains with new Futuremark test

Posted on Friday, March 27 2015 @ 12:35:40 CET by


Yesterday Futuremark announced the availability of the 3DMark API Overhead test, a new benchmark to simulate how many draw calls your PC can handle at 30fps with DX11, DX12 and Mantle. We've been hearing quite a lot in recent months about how much of a performance boost DX12 can deliver and this test deliver very promising results.

AMD did some testing of its own and writes DX12 enables 1547% more draw calls on a Radeon R9 290X and 953% more on a R7 260X. The firm also demonstrates CPU performance scaling with DX12. Real-world gains are going to be far less impressive of course but will still be very amazing.
DirectX 12 also has implications for performance scaling on multi-threaded CPUs. On an eight-core AMD FX-8350 CPU, the number of draw calls that can be issued under DirectX 12 scales with the number of cores on tap (up to six cores), while DirectX 11 doesn't take advantage of more than two cores. AMD says DirectX 12's multi-threaded command buffer recording capability is to thank for this performance scaling on the CPU.
TSMC logo

PC World did some further testing and discovered that in the 3DMark API comparison test, AMD's Radeon R9 290X manages to beat NVIDIA's GeForce GTX Titan X! However, keep in mind that Futuremark did not design this test as a tool to compare GPUs or even to compare different PCs. The firm explicitly mentions this test is for measuring API efficiency on individual PCs and should not be used for comparisons.

Source: The Tech Report



 



 

DV Hardware - Privacy statement
All logos and trademarks are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2002-2017 DM Media Group bvba