Processor Wars - waiting for the Merom, Conroe and Woodcrest

Posted on Wednesday, Jan 25 2006 @ 21:03 CET by Thomas De Maesschalck
DigiTimes posted the third part of their interview with Nebojsa Novakovic, a consultant in high-end computing systems, about the current state of processors.
Q: We're awaiting the arrival of a new-generation core from Intel, with the Merom, Conroe and Woodcrest processors. What scenarios do you anticipate, in terms of performance and the response from end-users and AMD?

A: According to the information that we have to date, the Merom/Conroe/Woodcrest core looks better than the Athlon 64 core, from the point of view of performance and power consumption. However, one thing that that the Merom/Conroe/Woodcrest core will lack is an interconnect that will scale smoothly in high-end systems. For PC systems, where the single-processor approach is normally adopted, unless Intel screws up, in terms of execution, which is always a possibility, I think that Conroe will probably emerge as the performance leader on the desktop in the fourth quarter of next year..
You can check it out over here.


About the Author

Thomas De Maesschalck

Thomas has been messing with computer since early childhood and firmly believes the Internet is the best thing since sliced bread. Enjoys playing with new tech, is fascinated by science, and passionate about financial markets. When not behind a computer, he can be found with running shoes on or lifting heavy weights in the weight room.



Loading Comments



Use Disqus to post new comments, the old comments are listed below.


Re: Processor Wars - waiting for the Merom, Conroe and Woodcrest
by Anonymous on Wednesday, Jan 25 2006 @ 21:53 CET
[quote] This is Part III of a five-part interview. Part I appeared on 23 January and Part II on 24 January. Part IV will follow on 26 January[/quote]



  • Reply by Anonymous on Thursday, Jan 26 2006 @ 00:42 CET

    Updated, thanks.