SCSI vs SATA, Which is Faster? Review

Posted on 2005-02-02 23:36:23 by LSDsmurf

When configuring a server or high end custom computer, we are often asked about the performance benefits of SCSI over SATA. Since SCSI is much more expensive, the common perception is that it must be significantly faster. The short answer we give to that issue is that with the release of 10,000 RPM SATA drives, SCSI simply does not hold the edge it used to, and we do not feel it is worth the sizable increase in cost. Of course, that statement is very general. Surely there are still applications that greatly benefit from SCSI, and it is the goal of this article to take a deeper look at the performance differences in SCSI vs SATA, and to tell you how those differences translate to performance in real world applications.



Link: Pudgetsystems



Loading Comments



Legacy comment system closed


Re: SCSI vs SATA, Which is Faster?
by Anonymous on Wednesday, November 23 2005 @ 18:56 CET
Where's the rest of the article?




  • Reply by Anonymous on Monday, November 28 2005 @ 18:00 CET

    Yes, where is the article?